In this section I just want to focus on the non-conference portion of the schedule for each MIAA team. What you'll see is the schedule by dates, within those you'll see ' * ' which denote in-region games. I'll point out the best and worst opponents and why. At the end you'll see each schedule will get a 'score', a number on a 1-100 scale with 100 being the highest or toughest possible. The difference in highest and lowest possible scores is just taking into account tournaments where the opponents are not yet set.
I could explain the math but I'll take the Paul Ryan approach and say it would take too long to explain. Its actually fairly simple, probably not all that accurate and open to quite a bit of fluctuation given that its trying to guess how good an opponent will be this season based off last. In other words just take it with a grain of salt and realize I was just kind of looking for a general idea.
Adrian
Nov. 16 vs Otterbein* @ WoosterNov. 17 @ Wooster* or vs Carnegie-Mellon*
Nov. 20 @ Sienna Heights
Nov. 24 @ Marygrove
Nov. 26 Michigan-Dearborn
Nov. 28 Mt. Union*
Dec. 1 @ Carnegie-Mellon*
Dec. 17 Northwestern Ohio
Dec. 22 @ Lawrence Tech
Dec. 29 vs Mt. Union* @ Defiance
Dec. 30 @ Defiance* or vs Finlandia*
* denotes in-region games
Best opponents and why: @ Wooster, the Fighting Scots figure to be one of, if not the favorite in the NCAC and will once again be among the strongest programs within the Great Lakes Region. If that game doesn't take place its probably @ Defiance. I have Defiance in a group of teams right in the middle of the HCAC fighting for playoff spots, and if that game doesn't take place it would be Mt. Union, a middle of the OAC team. Its a pretty big step down from Wooster to the next toughest.
Worst opponent and why: Lawrence Tech is resurrecting its basketball program after nearly 40 years on the shelf. The Southfield, MI school will be a very young and inexperienced squad.
Adrian has the added bonus of potentially playing Cargenie-Mellon and Mt. Union twice each. This is never ideal but at least these games are in-region.
Overall impression: For a team with some designs on winning an MIAA Championship this is a very weak schedule. None of the D3 squads on the schedule will be challenging for their league's respective titles other than Wooster. In fact I think its more likely than not that Otterbein and Carnegie will be at or near the bottom of their leagues and Finlandia will be Finlandia, not very good. Three of their 4 NAIA opponents finished at the bottom of the WHAC and Lawrence Tech is in its first year and will most likely finish at the bottom of the WHAC.
The biggest positive is Adrian landing 6 in-region games and more importantly not just 6 games but potentially 5 winnable in-region games. This will benefit not only Adrian but also the MIAA reps come NCAA time.
On my scale of 100, the best possible schedule score is 48.1, lowest 41.8
Last year by comparison: 58
click read more to read more